Tag Archives: Bill of Rights

In Obergefell, Did SCOTUS Create Non-Existent Constitutional Liberties?

Additionally, Chief Justice John Roberts makes the point in his dissent that “this Court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be. The people who ratified the Constitution authorized courts to exercise ‘neither force nor will but merely judgment.’” Continue reading

Posted in Constitution, News and Analysis, Religious Freedom Tagged , , , , , , , , , |

IRS abuse of power and the re-election of the president

Should anyone doubt the purpose of these recent revelations that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) targeted conservative Tea Party and patriotic grassroots groups such as the Glenn Beck inspired 9/12 groups seeking tax-exempt status from the government? Cast all skepticism aside. Be advised there was a single purpose to this act of unmitigated government tyranny…

Continue reading

Posted in Congressional & Government Reform, Constitution, Homepage Column One Row One, Taxation Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Newly Passed United Nations Gun Control Treaty Could be Used to Ban Private Gun Ownership

On April 2, 2013, the United Nations General Assembly voted to approve a treaty supported by the Obama administration that will restrict the export of firearms to countries with poor human rights records. The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) is being described as a gun control measure that will keep firearms out of the hands of insurgents, terrorists and organized crime.

Continue reading

Posted in Constitution, Sovereignty, United Nations Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Sovereignty and Activist Judges

In its current term, the U.S. Supreme Court will weigh in on many crucial and emotionally charged issues affecting the nation. These range from voting rights to same-sex marriage to race-based college admissions policies. The intensity of these disputes was on full display on February 27 during the court’s oral argument on the Voting Rights Act. Unusually visceral questioning from Justices Antonin Scalia and Sonia Sotomayor, representing opposite ends of the court’s ideological spectrum, offered a glimpse into the raw conflicts coming to a boil before the high court.

Continue reading

Posted in Constitution, Immigration & Border Security, News and Analysis, Sovereignty Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , |